非十二子 (Against the Twelve Masters) — Chinese ink painting

荀子 Xunzi · Chapter 6

非十二子

Against the Twelve Masters

View:

假今之世飾邪說

In Today's World, Deviant Doctrines Are Adorned

假今之世,飾邪說,文奸言,以梟亂天下,矞宇嵬瑣使天下混然不知是非治亂之所在者,有人矣。

In today's world there are those who adorn deviant doctrines and embellish treacherous words, throwing the world into confusion and chaos, making the world so muddled that it cannot distinguish right from wrong or order from disorder.

六派之失

The Errors of the Six Schools

縱情性,安恣孳,禽獸行,不足以合文通治;然而其持之有故,其言之成理,足以欺惑愚眾;是它囂魏牟也。忍情性,綦溪利跂,苟以分異人為高,不足以合大眾,明大分,然而其持之有故,其言之成理,足以欺惑愚眾:是陳仲史也。不知壹天下建國家之權稱,上功用,大儉約,而僈差等,曾不足以容辨異,縣君臣;然而其持之有故,其言之成理,足以欺惑愚眾:是墨翟宋鈃也。尚法而無法,下修而好作,上則取聽於上,下則取從於俗,終日言成文典,反紃察之,則倜然無所歸宿,不可以經國定分;然而其持之有故,其言之成理,足以欺惑愚眾:是慎到田駢也。不法先王,不是禮義,而好治怪說,玩琦辭,甚察而不惠,辯而無用,多事而寡功,不可以為治綱紀;然而其持之有故,其言之成理,足以欺惑愚眾;是惠施鄧析也。

Those who give free rein to natural impulses, indulge desire at will, and behave like beasts — their doctrines cannot unite civilization or achieve governance; yet their positions have grounds and their arguments form logical patterns, sufficient to deceive and confuse the ignorant masses. These are Tuo Xiao and Wei Mou. Those who repress natural impulses, practice extreme asceticism, and consider differentiating themselves from others as loftiness — their doctrines cannot unite the masses or clarify the great social divisions; yet their positions have grounds and their arguments form logical patterns, sufficient to deceive the ignorant. These are Chen Zhong and Shi Qiu. Those who do not understand the proper balance for unifying the world and establishing states, who elevate utility, magnify frugality, and disdain social hierarchy, who cannot even accommodate the distinctions between ruler and minister — yet their positions have grounds and their arguments form logical patterns, sufficient to deceive the ignorant. These are Mozi and Song Xing. Those who esteem law yet have no real law, who neglect self-cultivation and love innovation, who above take their cues from authority and below follow popular custom, who talk all day producing polished texts but upon examination have nothing coherent at their core, and whose doctrines cannot govern a state or establish social divisions — yet their positions have grounds and their arguments form logical patterns, sufficient to deceive the ignorant. These are Shen Dao and Tian Pian. Those who do not model the former kings, do not affirm ritual propriety, but love to construct bizarre theories and play with curious phrases, who are extremely acute but not beneficial, eloquent but useless, busy but accomplishing little, whose doctrines cannot serve as principles of governance — yet their positions have grounds and their arguments form logical patterns, sufficient to deceive the ignorant. These are Hui Shi and Deng Xi.

Notes

1person墨翟Mò Dí

Mozi (墨翟, c. 470-391 BC) was the founder of Mohism, which advocated universal love, frugality, and opposition to aggressive warfare. Xunzi criticizes his rejection of ritual distinctions and social hierarchy.

2person慎到Shèn Dào

Shen Dao (慎到, c. 395-315 BC) was a Legalist thinker who emphasized the power of institutional position (勢) over personal virtue.

子思孟軻之罪

The Fault of Zisi and Mencius

略法先王而不知其統,猶然而猶材劇志大,聞見雜博。案往舊造說,謂之五行,甚僻違而無類,幽隱而無說,閉約而無解。案飾其辭,而只敬之,曰:此真先君子之言也。子思唱之,孟軻和之。世俗之溝猶瞀儒、嚾嚾然不知其所非也,遂受而傳之,以為仲尼子弓為茲厚於後世:是則子思孟軻之罪也。

Those who roughly model the former kings but do not grasp their underlying unity, who are nonetheless talented, ambitious, and broadly learned — who fabricate theories based on ancient precedent and call them the 'Five Phases,' which are exceedingly deviant and lack proper categorization, obscure and lacking in explanation, constricted and lacking in resolution. They polish their rhetoric and reverently proclaim: 'These are truly the words of our former masters.' Zisi initiated this and Mencius echoed it. The muddled, befuddled pedants of popular convention noisily accepted and transmitted it without knowing what was wrong, taking it to be Confucius's and Zigong's great legacy to later generations. This is the fault of Zisi and Mencius.

Notes

1person孟軻Mèng Kē

Zisi (子思, c. 483-402 BC) was the grandson of Confucius and traditionally credited with the Doctrine of the Mean. Mencius (孟軻, c. 372-289 BC) was the most influential Confucian after Confucius himself. Xunzi's critique of them is one of the most controversial passages in early Chinese philosophy.

Edition & Source

Text
《荀子》 Xunzi
Edition
《四部叢刊》本
Commentary
Traditional commentaries